Review rules

Review rules manuscripts

The editorial board of the scientific journal carries out double-blind review of all incoming materials corresponding to the subject matter. your profile and formal requirements.

The review process is carried out within two weeks. The expert makes a brief review of the manuscript, which notes the expediency or inexpediency of publication, the advantages and disadvantages of the article, and the possibility of its revision.

Manuscripts are evaluated according to the following criteria::

• matching the issue theme;

• novelty and originality of the material, reflection of modern scientific approaches (domestic and foreign) and related publications;

• professionalism (clear problem statement, correct argumentation, adequate use of scientific methods, strict use of concepts, etc.);

• scientific style of presentation (clarity and structure of the presentation, accuracy, consistency, consistency, evidence, etc.);

• compliance of the design with the requirements for the manuscript.

If the material requires further development, the author is sent a letter with appropriate recommendations. If the author does not submit the revised manuscript within the deadline specified in the letter, the manuscript is considered rejected. After the author submits the revised manuscript, it is re-examined. If the expert concludes that the recommendations were not taken into account by the author, the manuscript is rejected and correspondence with the author is terminated. In case of refusal to publish, the editorial board sends the author a reasoned refusal using the review materials.

Reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal for at least 5 years. Copies of reviews can be provided to the author, as well as to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon request.